Metagame tier list — Premodern
Ranks every Challenge-played strategy in the window by a hybrid signal: 75% Wilson-lower-bound match win rate from Challenges and 25% League 5-0 trophy throughput, modulated by a mild presence multiplier so popular decks edge slightly ahead of fringe ones. Leagues stay out of the MWR (every League row is 5-0 by construction) and contribute only through the trophy term. S is reserved for decks with Wilson lower-bound ≥ 58%, ≥ 200 matches, ≥ 5% meta share, and composite ≥ 0.62 — at most 2 per window.
S
Dominant, format-warping — must expect, test against, and plan for. Capped at 2 per window; an empty S means no single deck is running the format.
Wilson0.95 58.7% · GW 59.2% · score 0.646
Meta share 17.7% (315 apps)
A
Solidly above the field. Reliable Challenge performers, often with steady League trophies too.
Wilson0.95 57.1% · GW 58.6% · score 0.619
Meta share 7.1% (127 apps)
Wilson0.95 53.3% · GW 55.9% · score 0.581
Meta share 10.3% (184 apps)
Wilson0.95 55.9% · GW 57.7% · score 0.562
Meta share 6.6% (118 apps)
Wilson0.95 49.7% · GW 52.3% · score 0.559
Meta share 6.7% (120 apps)
Wilson0.95 54.0% · GW 55.3% · score 0.554
Meta share 8.7% (154 apps)
Wilson0.95 51.8% · GW 56.3% · score 0.536
Meta share 4.2% (75 apps)
Wilson0.95 54.0% · GW 55.9% · score 0.522
Meta share 3.3% (59 apps)
Wilson0.95 50.9% · GW 57.7% · score 0.513
Meta share 1.4% (25 apps)
Wilson0.95 55.0% · GW 57.6% · score 0.500
Meta share 1.3% (24 apps)
Wilson0.95 52.2% · GW 58.2% · score 0.451
Meta share 0.4% (8 apps)
B
Roughly average winrate after sample-size correction.
Wilson0.95 49.2% · GW 54.6% · score 0.496
Meta share 1.6% (29 apps)
Wilson0.95 50.2% · GW 57.0% · score 0.485
Meta share 2.9% (51 apps)
Wilson0.95 53.0% · GW 59.9% · score 0.476
Meta share 3.0% (53 apps)
Wilson0.95 48.0% · GW 55.3% · score 0.473
Meta share 2.9% (51 apps)
Wilson0.95 52.1% · GW 59.6% · score 0.460
Meta share 1.2% (21 apps)
Wilson0.95 47.2% · GW 51.3% · score 0.448
Meta share 3.4% (61 apps)
Wilson0.95 47.9% · GW 55.9% · score 0.444
Meta share 1.4% (25 apps)
Wilson0.95 45.3% · GW 51.9% · score 0.437
Meta share 2.2% (40 apps)
C
Below average but still scored. Stable enough to rank.
Wilson0.95 43.4% · GW 52.3% · score 0.418
Meta share 0.7% (12 apps)
Wilson0.95 39.8% · GW 48.2% · score 0.408
Meta share 1.0% (17 apps)
Wilson0.95 43.1% · GW 54.2% · score 0.402
Meta share 1.0% (17 apps)
Wilson0.95 46.6% · GW 54.1% · score 0.397
Meta share 1.6% (29 apps)
Wilson0.95 37.4% · GW 50.1% · score 0.393
Meta share 1.0% (18 apps)
Wilson0.95 46.1% · GW 56.1% · score 0.385
Meta share 0.6% (11 apps)
Wilson0.95 39.9% · GW 50.6% · score 0.383
Meta share 1.0% (17 apps)
Wilson0.95 34.1% · GW 46.9% · score 0.374
Meta share 0.4% (8 apps)
Wilson0.95 45.7% · GW 55.8% · score 0.353
Meta share 0.6% (10 apps)
Wilson0.95 32.5% · GW 51.6% · score 0.352
Meta share 0.4% (7 apps)
Fringe / insufficient data
Insufficient sample — under 30 Challenge matches in the window (or below the 0.35 score floor) but at least 1% of meta share. Surfaced for visibility — not ranked.
Wilson0.95 47.0% · GW 55.0% · score 0.338
Meta share 1.2% (22 apps)
Methodology. mixed = 0.75 × Wilson0.95(matchWins, matchWins + matchLosses) + 0.25 × log1p(trophies)/log1p(formatMaxTrophies); score = mixed × (0.85 + 0.15 × log1p(meta%·100)/log1p(100)). S is reserved for decks with Wilson lower-bound ≥ 58%, ≥ 200 matches, ≥ 5% meta share, and composite ≥ 0.62 — at most 2 per window, and an empty S is a real signal that no single deck is running the format. A/B/C are 0.50 / 0.42 / 0.35 score floors. Anything under 30 Challenge matches drops to Unranked regardless of WR. A "notable niche" override promotes any deck with raw MWR ≥ 0.60 over 30+ matches to at least B (≥ 0.65 over 50+ matches to A), so genuinely strong but low-share decks like Premodern Replenish aren't penalized for sample size; the override never promotes to S. Records from Leagues stay out of the MWR — every League row is 5-0 by construction and would skew every Wilson interval upward — they contribute only through the trophy term.